Amar Bhide on Hayek, Innovation & Entrepreneurial Judgment
In The Harvard Business Review. Highly recommended.
In The Harvard Business Review. Highly recommended.
Gets called to account one more time for lying about Hayekian business cycle theory.
Don’t listen to the guys who — you know — got just about everything right over the past decade.
Let’s not pay attention to economists who — you know — actually understood what was happening before it happened.
We can’t let that happen.
Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom enters its 12th week on the Amazon’s Top 100 bestsellers list, this week at #73.
The “Taking Hayek Seriously” blog will continue at a “vacation” level of activity until sometime after the beginning of the school year, mid-September or so.
And the Fat Man. A parable for our times.
on the reality of current economic situation and how we got here.
The Pantry Proof against socialist economic planning.
ht ricketyclick
I’m driving past 20 miles of these empty railroad lumber transport cars in Eastern Oregon, which are being stored on an unused rail spur. The cars have been there for 2 years. A living image of the Hayekian malinvestment boom and bust cycle:

Data: the boom-bust consumer spending recalculation cycle http://bit.ly/9GphKe
Costco sells Hayek by the pallet http://bit.ly/duBxNM
Hayek goes wholesale http://bit.ly/cFNRpC
F. A. Hayek interviewed by the NY Times, Dec. 1, 1982:
“On the scale on which [tax cutting] is being tried, I’m a little apprehensive. I’m all for reduction of government expenditures but to anticipate it by reducing the rate of taxation before you have reduced expenditure is a very risky thing to do.”
“The only way you can finance deficits is by inflation. You cannot raise this amount of money by genuine borrowing. You borrow from banks, which create credit for the purpose. A large government deficit is a certain way to inflation.”
From the March 25, 1985 issue of Profil 13, translated by an anonymous blogger:
“[Reagan's] politics? When the government of the United States borrows a large part of the savings of the world, the consequence is that capital must become scarce and expensive in the whole world. That’s a problem.”
“You see, one of Reagan’s advisers told me why the president has permitted [massive deficits] to happen, which makes the matter partly excusable: Reagan thinks it is impossible to persuade Congress that expenditures must be reduced unless one creates deficits so large that absolutely everyone becomes convinced that no more money can be spent .. [Reagan believes he can] persuade Congress of the necessity of spending reductions by means of an immense deficit. Unfortunately, he has not succeeded!!!”
Arnold Kling has rediscovered another Hayek insight:
“Most unoccupied houses have close to zero marginal value to the vast majority of consumers, just as most unemployed workers have zero marginal product to the vast majority of firms.”
The distinction between economic and non economic goods seems lost on any economist who has not read Menger, but this conceptual insight stands as the very first building stone of economic science.
Eamonn Butler’s excellent short study of Hayek’s economics and social philosophy is now available on the internet as a pdf document. The book is Hayek: His Contribution to the Political and Economic Thought of Our Time.
F. A. Hayek page. Of particular interest — “Key Concepts in Hayek’s Thought”.
ht Molivam42.