Author Archives: Greg Ransom
It It “Unscientific” To Rethink the Explanatory and Conceptual Fundamentals of a Science?
Darwin, Galileo, Mayr, Copernicus, Edelman, Newton, and Hayek all rethought the very fundamentals of their sciences, from the problems and explanatory strategies of their disciplines, to the logical status and conceptual role of the elements of their activities. Yet among … Continue reading
James Ransom, 2003-2016
My wife, my daughters, and I have lost our beautiful son and brother, James Ransom, 2003-2013 to the long-term psychological effects of a traumatic brain injury. My family believes it is important that people know that James was not depressed, … Continue reading
Setting up Hayek’s Revolution: extending the logic of choice from consumer goods to production goods (draft)
Thomas Kuhn describes how science precedes working on normal science puzzles which have anticipated, non-problematic solutions. When those don’t work out, scientists begin to rethinking the conceptual space, the empirical problem to be explained, and the possible explanatory solutions to … Continue reading
Logic versus empirical problems and causal processes — Hayek’s revolution
Economists do not understand Hayek. They simply don’t. I want here to explain in simple terms what economists don’t get, and what they would grasp if they were to ever understood what Hayek is doing. Thomas Kuhn explains how roadblocks … Continue reading
My Reply to David Wilson on Hayek & the Use of Mathematical Population Biology Models in the Social Sciences (draft)
David Wilson has asked me to read his discussion of Hayek and the growing literature on multilevel selection modeling and the wider literature of human cultural evolution. This is my reply which I hope he will welcome in the spirit … Continue reading
