HAYEKIAN REALITIES BRING ‘NORMAL SCIENCE’ TO AN END IN MACROECONOMICS

By Greg Ransom, on March 23rd, 2011%

A long period of Kuhnian “normal science” is over in macroeconomics, banking, and finance — the news comes directly from the top guns in science (see also here, here, here, and here.)   What killed it? A series of empirical and conceptual anomalies — Hayekian facts — too immense to ignore.  Hayekian facts like the . . . → Read More: HAYEKIAN REALITIES BRING ‘NORMAL SCIENCE’ TO AN END IN MACROECONOMICS

2 comments - (Comments are closed)   Macroeconometrics    

Arnold Kling on the Pseudo-Science of Macroeconometrics

By Greg Ransom, on February 18th, 2010%

Few economists have a sophisticated theoretical education in macroeconometric modeling — many are the equivalent of children playing with a computer game they really don’t understand.  Arnold Kling is not one of these.  In a series of essays Kling has been sharing a practitioner’s inside view of the lost knowledge of a generation which had . . . → Read More: Arnold Kling on the Pseudo-Science of Macroeconometrics

One comment - (Comments are closed)   Macroeconometrics, Scientism
Follow FriedrichHayek on Twitter

Random Quote

Right after we published our first findings [on path dependence and complexity theory], we started getting letters from all over the country saying, ‘You know, all you guys have done is rediscover Austrian economics’ .. I admit I wasn’t familiar with Hayek and von Mises as the time. But now that I’ve read them, I can see that this is essentially true. — Brian Arthur
خرید ساکس خرید وی پی ان خرید vpn خرید vpn