|
||||||
|
As pointed out by an endless stream of leading academic specialists, Jeffrey Sachs & Paul Krugman are constantly making false and deeply ignorant claims about Friedrich Hayek and his work. The latest false and ignorant claims of Jeffrey Sachs and Paul Krugman can be found in “Masters of Money – Friedrich Hayek” presented by Stephanie . . . → Read More: The Bottomless Ignorance of Jeffrey Sachs & Paul Krugman
Paul Krugman proudly tells us he can’t bring himself to learn any economics produced before he was a graduate student and written in plain English — and he’s constantly proving the case with crashingly ignorant discussion of economic history and the history of economic thought. Krugman has combined his patent ignorance in these two fields . . . → Read More: PAUL KRUGMAN, YOUR INCOMPETENCE IS SHOWING
Paul Krugman: if you’ve reached the point where you don’t pay attention to anything that might disturb your orthodoxy, you’re not doing science, you’re not even pursuing a discipline. All you’re doing is perpetuating a smug, closed-minded sect. Compare Paul Krugman. Paul Krugman is famous for saying he can’t bring himself to read any economics . . . → Read More: ECONOMISTS SAY THE DARNDEST THINGS
Paul Krugman: Some have asked if there aren’t conservative sites I read regularly. Well, no. I will read anything I’ve been informed about that’s either interesting or revealing; but I don’t know of any economics or politics sites on that side that regularly provide analysis or information I need to take seriously.
Robert Murphy helps Paul Krugman with the economic education he didn’t get at MIT. Best part — Murphy’s reply to Krugman’s confused “empirical” challenge to the Hayekian account of the Great Recalculation.
Paul Krugman fails the test.
Or, PAUL KRUGMAN DISSEMBLES AGAIN. David Beckworth and Scott Sumner — citing Hayek, Selgin, Horwitz, and White — claim the mantle of Friedrich Hayek in making their case for NGDP targeting, quantitative easing, and a monetary disequilibrium understanding of the current economic pathology. And Beckworth explicitly cites Hayek as among those who informed and inspired . . . → Read More: WILL THE REAL “AUSTRIAN” PLEASE STAND UP
Things aren’t less ugly than you thought — Paul Krugman is likening Tea Party Republicans to blood-thirsty Nazis.
You didn’t know that? It’s perhaps time we take the warning signs seriously. Paul’s crazy-guy darkly Manichean view of the world is beginning to scare me. It’s not tied to reality and its fixated on violence. And now Krugman has gone Loughner, tying his unbalanced Manichean visions up to disagreements over monetary theory. Can we . . . → Read More: PAUL KRUGMAN REVELS IN THE SIMULATED MURDER OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS
I look forward to the formal censure of Paul Krugman by the courageous and principled American Economic Association and that deep well of high character, the Princeton Faculty Senate. The latest on America’s “Professor Hate” here, here, here, here, and here. ht Cafe Hayek & Instapundit UPDATE: A friend of the killer: “he did not . . . → Read More: PAUL KRUGMAN — “the man who types at the speed of hate”
Paul Krugman is falsely, viciously smearing Americans who believe in limited government — his intellectual and political rivals — as accomplices to mass murder. How precious. If he’d done this to any other class of American lets hope he’d be made a pariah in his profession and shunned by his peers at professional events. But . . . → Read More: WOULD ECONOMISTS SHUN A PROFESSIONAL PEER SPREADING BLOOD LIBELS AGAINST AMERICAN JEWS?
Paul Krugman — a continuing disgrace to professional economists everywhere. More on Paul Krugman’s taste for incendiary rhetoric and blood libels here, here, and here, along with continuing broader coverage of the hypocritical, hate spreading, blood libeling left at Instapundit and Michelle Malkin. UPDATE: Krugman’s taste for burning figures of his leftist hate to death . . . → Read More: HOW LOATHSOME IS PAUL KRUGMAN?
|
 |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2014 Taking Hayek Seriously - All Rights Reserved |
||||||
