<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Friedrich Hayek&#8221; subsection &#8216;Work&#8217; &#8211; Wikipedia Entry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hayekcenter.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hayekcenter.org/?p=1652</link>
	<description>Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of The Constitution of Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger McKinney</title>
		<link>http://hayekcenter.org/?p=1652&#038;cpage=1#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger McKinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hayekcenter.org/?p=1652#comment-504</guid>
		<description>PS, the entry is great! You won&#039;t have too many comments because not many people know more about Hayek than you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, the entry is great! You won&#8217;t have too many comments because not many people know more about Hayek than you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger McKinney</title>
		<link>http://hayekcenter.org/?p=1652&#038;cpage=1#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger McKinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hayekcenter.org/?p=1652#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Greg, On the business cycles section, I prefer Hayek&#039;s &quot;Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle&quot; and &quot;Profits, Interest and Investment&quot; to &quot;Prices and Production.&quot; MTTC lays the foundation for how credit changes. PII is a restatement of PP but I think it is better written and easier to understand. 

And don&#039;t you think you should say something about the Ricardo Effect? Maybe that&#039;s getting too technical, but it seems to be the heart of his business cycle theory and important enough to write an essay on it after publishing &quot;Pure Theory.&quot; A note about why the next generation of Austrians have ignored the effect would interest me, but then I&#039;m a wonk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, On the business cycles section, I prefer Hayek&#8217;s &#8220;Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle&#8221; and &#8220;Profits, Interest and Investment&#8221; to &#8220;Prices and Production.&#8221; MTTC lays the foundation for how credit changes. PII is a restatement of PP but I think it is better written and easier to understand. </p>
<p>And don&#8217;t you think you should say something about the Ricardo Effect? Maybe that&#8217;s getting too technical, but it seems to be the heart of his business cycle theory and important enough to write an essay on it after publishing &#8220;Pure Theory.&#8221; A note about why the next generation of Austrians have ignored the effect would interest me, but then I&#8217;m a wonk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
