Have the courts gone to far? The latest outrage from the Federal circuit courts. Quotable:
A federal judge today rejected an appeal on behalf of the American people to restore 'sovereignty' to the citizens of the United States. In a 12-page ruling the unnamed judge said, "the United States is governed by laws, not by men, and must therefore be ruled by those appointed to interpret the laws, not by the elected representatives of the people."Posted by Greg Ransom | TrackBackThe plaintiffs, emboldened by the Bush administration's decision to more rapidly return power to the citizens of Iraq, had cited the Declaration of Independence and Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution to justify their contention that government derives its power from the "consent of the governed" through their elected representatives. They also argued that Article III, Section 2, calls on the courts to decide cases under the laws created by Congress, rather than to create law using cases brought by activists.
However, the judge found neither of those assertions compelling, and ruled that "the United States will continue to live under the sovereignty of the judiciary .. "