PRESTOPUNDIT -- A Good Blog at a Great Price. Guaranteed.

Our ant-Bush news services. "A few days ago, the Financial Times was back with more news: An independent British commission investigating the government's use of intelligence during the runup to the war in Iraq, the paper reported on Wednesday, "is expected to conclude that Britain's spies were correct to say that Saddam Hussein's regime sought to buy uranium from Niger." But this, too, has been largely ignored by the American press. Curious, no? Journalists couldn't get enough of this topic when the story line was that Bush and the British had lied. Shouldn't they find it just as riveting when facts point in the other direction?"

MORE JEFF JACOBY -- "A new look at Bush's '16 words'".

Are they anti-Bush because they they are anti-war? or are they anti-Bush because they are anti-America? Or maybe they anti-Bush just because they are Democrats and leftists. Michael Moore is with no doubt all of these. Unfortunately it is often its very hard to distinguish the American press from the likes of Michael Moore. Certainly it would be nice if the press made this all easy to tell. But they don't. Posted by Greg Ransom | TrackBack