The Wall Street Journal blackballs Michelle Malkin.
"The problem, an editorial-page staffer informed me, stemmed from two columns I had written (
here and
here) .. which had challenged the WSJ's advocacy of amnesty for illegal aliens. Were there factual inaccuracies in either of those pieces? No. In fact, the only errors in those columns were the ones I pointed out had been made by the WSJ editorial page when it mischaracterized the amnesty program it was championing.
I was told by the editorial features staffer that I had antagonized the page's higher-ups. The bottom line is that my criticism of the WSJ's misleading pro-illegal alien propaganda caused me to be shut out of the esteemed editorial pages .. ".
MORE -- Michelle Malkin: "WHY THE WALL STREET JOURNAL IS SNORT-WORTHY".
Posted by Greg Ransom
| TrackBack