March 29, 2005

ECONOMIST Robert Barro turns his guns on Social Security "private accounts." (pdf file)

And Barro isn't the only classicly liberal economist who's turned on the "private accounts" version of Social Security reform. The WaPost has the story:

In his column, Barro argued that politicians will never allow private accounts to replace the Social Security system. So the accounts system -- as outlined by Bush -- would end up being what Barro views as an unwise supplement to existing benefits. Instead, he argued, the program should be stripped down to a minimum payout to keep the elderly out of poverty while putting Social Security on solid financial footing. "There is no good reason to go beyond the minimum standard; that is why I view personal accounts as a mistake -- they enlarge a Social Security program that already promises too much," Barro wrote.
UPDATE: Arnold Kling:
The Washington Post was excited to report this as a split among conservatives on the Social Security issue. In fact, I believe that conservatives are quite united in their belief that it is a fiendishly bad program ..
Posted by Greg Ransom